9/20/2023 0 Comments Sans serif typeface![]() ![]() And there are studies that support sans serif typefaces as superior for people living with certain disabilities (such as certain visual challenges and those who learn differently Russell-Minda et al., 2007). For example, there are studies that demonstrate how serif fonts are actually superior to sans serif in many long texts (Arditi & Cho, 2005 Tinker, 1963). Research supports the use of various fonts for different contexts. However, it is important to acknowledge that images of text (such as a picture of a word), whether serif or sans serif, cannot be personalized by such settings this is why global accessibility standards forbid images of text (except for logos and other situations where meaning would be lost, such as a book about the history of typefaces). Even people who lack the technical knowledge to adjust their font settings will benefit from font designs that are highly legible, whether serif or sans serif. Historically, sans serif fonts have been preferred for online works and serif fonts for print works however, screen resolutions in use today throughout the world can typically accommodate either type of font.įurthermore, people who use assistive technologies can adjust font settings (e.g., size, typeface, horizontal and vertical spacing) to their preferences for any content that conforms to global accessibility standards. It is a common misconception that serif fonts (e.g., Times New Roman) should be avoided because they are hard to read and that sans serif fonts (e.g., Calibri or Arial) are preferred. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |